• Provides only a mist for the balls to roll through. Less energy is lost.

• No high-pressure oil supply or seals to fail.

• •Vertical installations are possible.

• •No water or oil lines.

• •Cold start-ups and hot shut downs are not an issue.

• •Almost no oil leakage to the engine for reduced particulate emissions and no increase in emissions with increased hours of operation.

Bearing Drag Chart
Horsepower Drag on left . . . RPM on the bottom

For illustration purposes only

The above chart explains Turbo-Lag
The secret is out ... now you know why even conventional ball bearing turbochargers still have Turbo-Lag.

• A 4" journal bearing is requiring over two horsepower just to turn the bearing.

• A flooded ball bearing is still requiring almost one horsepower to push the balls through the oil.

• The answer is the Aerocharger^® 2.0.  It has balls rolling free in a light mist of oil allowing almost all the power generated by the turbine wheel to be directed to the compressor to make boost.
  Aren't you just a little envious?

• The extra horsepower required to turn a bearing is coming from the turbine causing back pressure on the exhaust ... NOT good!

• The bearing drag also means less power to the compressor for boost ... NOT good either!

The Aerocharger^® 2.0
has less back pressure on the exhaust and more boost of the engine without noticeable Turbo-Lag ... life is GOOD with boost!

Graph below shows a comparison of different forced induction systems coming on boost:

• The Advanced Aerocharger^®

• Conventional Turbocharger

• Positive-Displacement Mechanical Supercharger

• Centrifugal Supercharger.

All the units ended at the same Max Horsepower . . . but one of them came on much earlier than the rest!
Questions: Which one finishes the quarter mile sooner?
Which one exits the corner quicker?
If you were on a snowmobile racing your buddies, who wins?
Come on guys, this isn't rocket science ... it's the Aerocharger^®

^{Now this is a Trick Question . . . which one cost more?
Answer:  It depends - the Aerocharger® 2.0 turbocharger cost more, it has more parts, tolerances and specifications more difficult to manufacture to say nothing of the space-age materials. But what is the answer after you take out the waste gate, pop-off valve, oil lines, coolant lines and consider the ease of installation!}

^{Reliability?
The Aerocharger has spent hours on the test stand (in the field), at high boost levels (ATVs), very dirty environment (Sand Rails), long duration at full throttle (Snowmobiles) and let's not forget the vibration test (H-D Motorcycles). I bet you didn't know the Aerocharger passed a 1000-hour endurance test by a major OEM or that it ran on a continuous duty cycle for over 2 years on a specially modified military piece of equipment.}